Group gatherings... [PART 2]

In continuing with this 'durian' theme, and unique parties, I decided to not only look at the party itself and what it involves, but who it involves.

From the last post, it is evident that there were quite a decent number of people who attended.

Who are they and how do they know each other? And very importantly...why durian party?

Name: Rodney Ooi
Knows everyone through: Church...many years ago
Durian party? Well, I'm from Malaysia, and it's a very popular fruit there. Most of us are from that region, so we all love the fruit. We don't eat it very often because it's not available everywhere, so we come together to enjoy it with other people who love it too.




Name: Annie
Knows everyone through: Our old church in Castle Hill, and we are all very good friends.
Durian party? We all love the durian, and this is the second time we have had a durian party. We just get together, catch up with each other, and share our love of durians! It's the best fruit, and we all agree! Some people say that they don't like the smell of it, but I think everyone should try it.

Names: Pat and Karina Yee
Knows everyone through: Well, we all used to go to the same church, but even though we all go to different churches now, we try to keep in contact and see each other when we can.
Durian party? Yeah, we are all from parts of Asia, mostly in the Singapore/Malaysian area, and the durian is very big over there. I don't really see it much in the stores, so we don't eat it much, so it's good that we have this party because we get to see each other and most importantly, have durian!

Karina was too shy to answer any questions, but we can safely assume that from her absence from the actual 'site' of the durians, and her presence indoors with the other kids...she is not particularly fond of the fruit. This just reinforces the comment made in the last post about most young people avoiding the event, and only the young children being present, because they have no choice. Perhaps the taste of the durian is an acquired one.

So, what can be gathered from the responses is that:

a) everyone that attended the party knew each other quite well
b) they are all from parts of Asia where the fruit is in abundance
c) they have the parties to catch up and share their love for the fruit
d) it is mostly a generational thing, with parents adoring the fruit, and the kids mostly avoiding it

Group gatherings of a different kind...

When I think about people gathering in one location, I think about concerts, birthday parties, parties where people just want to get drunk, and Christmas. One thing I don’t think about, however, is people gathering at a person’s home to eat fruit.

Enter the durian, a Southeast Asian fruit, identifiable by its spiky husk and…interesting smell. It has been called the King of all tropical fruit, and is commonly found in Malaysia and Indonesia, but is popular in many other countries in the region. One British traveller said of the durian, "it is of such an excellent taste that it surpasses in flavour all the other fruits of the world."



I wish I could capture its pungent aroma in words, but you’ll just have to experience it for itself. One person at this gathering described it as having a “sweet odour”, which, though still vague, is probably the best way to describe it. This may turn you off it, but one taste and you’ll want more.

But back to the actual ‘party’ itself. It is 12 o’clock in the afternoon, and the couples start arriving. Mostly people of Singaporean/Malaysian background attend, and they are all older couples. The only children you will see here are the very young ones who could not be left home on their own.



Two men are seemingly nominated as the ‘durian openers’, the ones who will be responsible for using a variety of household tools to get through to the fruit inside.

Especially for the occasion, 5 boxes of the fruit are bought and thawed, as the fruits are not readily available in Australia, but must be imported. All in all, there are 20 durians, all very decent sizes, available for consumption. Once they are opened, of course.



One of the men explains to me “you have to look at the durian, and try to find the ‘lines’. This will show you where to cut, because you can’t just cut anywhere, or it will not open properly.”



Personally, looking at the fruit and the size of the knives they were using made me want to steer clear. The exterior almost screams, DO NOT TOUCH! But inside, it’s a whole different story, as you see the yellowy soft, creamy fruit inside. According to some, it tastes like heaven and stinks like hell.



Essentially, it’s a weird idea to have a ‘durian party’, but who’s to judge? After all, people come together for all sorts of reasons, ranging from the traditional, to the more extreme. If people can come together to wear togas and wear holly on their heads, it only seems fair that people can come together to eat a fruit that they all enjoy, and socialise in the process.

Fairness in blogging?

Since my last posting, the amount of posts on Hot Air has surged. As there are so many contributors, this is not surprising.

Some things I have noticed as a result of the previously discussed characteristics of the blog:

- many topics are ‘recycled’, and many are later ‘updated’, which makes it hard to keep track of what is happening on the site, but makes it easy for contributors to edit their posts without creating new ones. An example of this is a follow-up story about the Clintons and their riches, which seems to have been a popular topic, mentioned over a few days: ‘My superhuman task this morning; Update: The Clintons’ “unusual” tax returns’.

Photo taken from BBC Media Images

The posting is very typical of this site, as it mixes video content with the blogger’s own words. The blogger has obviously posted his opinions, received many comments, and was then able to update his post as soon as there was more information for him to write about. This increases the accuracy of his post for readers who may view it later, but makes it hard for other viewers to backtrack to his post in case of any updates. With the amount of posts each day, this is a major problem with blogs of this nature.

- Another thing which was not mentioned last time was the individual post descriptions, which provide an additional, short comment, which may or may not affect readership. I find that sometimes, they do not do anything for the article whatsoever, but that sometimes they offer a bit of humor/sarcasm/opinion before the reader actually gets to the article. Sometimes, they also respond to rhetorical questions which are given in the title of the posts, which adds to this idea of blogs being very opinionated. A lot of the time, however, you have to actually read the post before the descriptions make any sense.

In terms of the US election, there are still many frequent postings on this subject, from the trivial to the more serious, but almost always with a light approach. On April 5 there was a posting about namecalling in politics, and in particular, Obama acknowledging McCain as a ‘warmonger’.

Photo taken from Double Speak

In postings such as this, I am very impressed to see an attempt to balance opinions, as it can be so easy for people to just post their opinions and disregard all others.

In Ed Morrissey’s post: ‘Obama surrogate: McCain a “warmonger”; Update: McCain’s not a warmonger, says Obama camp’, though there is an opinion that Obama was calling McCain a warmonger, his update shows that in fact, Obama, though seemingly agreeing with the comment, did not actually say it. Morrissey then proceeded to state Obama’s opinion on the issue (even though it was given by his spokeswoman), which I felt added some credibility to his writing.

It can be argued that blogs are meant to be an individual's/group's opinions, and therefore, are allowed to be biased. But I think that though blogs are traditionally very opinionated outlets, it is nice to see some sort of an attempt at even-handedness by bloggers, and if anything, it makes the blog better.

A Breath of Hot Air

Hot Air: We Pick, You Click

Hot Air was founded by Michelle Malkin in 2006, and the site is about ‘fighting hot air with Hot Air’. After noticing that a lot of politically-oriented videos online were produced ‘by liberals for liberals’, she created this site as a go-between, to ‘bring ideological diversity’. It mainly presents itself as a videoblogging site, but much of it is still text.

The current topic which is most prevalent on this site is the election in the US. Bloggers seem to be posting about the election regularly, and very often. In April alone, at least 13 of the 30 blog postings are about the election and its candidates. This is despite the fact that the postings can be about anything, and usually revolve around current news items.

The style of the blog is very casual and conversational, as it appeals to its contributors who also double as its audience. Most comments are very agreeable, as the site reflects what the average person thinks...because mostly, it is written by them. The site has a tremendous amount of links, from affiliates to radio stations, to other blogs, satirical cartoons and pure online entertainment. In this way, it probably increases its traffic, by linking to other sites. Per day, it has an average of 346,910 page views.

In terms of the election, there are multiple postings per day regarding this topic, with eight postings on April 4. Though some topics are quite trivial, such as Obama being a smoker, others discuss more newsy issues, such as the Clintons and their riches, and scandals in the election campaign.

The postings make comments on the current political situation which may or may not be highlighted in the media, but which definitely put them out there. In ‘Another fundraiser scandal for Hilary?’, blogger Ed Morrissey says, “In 2006, the Democrats ran against the “culture of corruption”. In 2008, they look more like the party of corruption. Hillary may soon disappear from the presidential election, but her legacy will continue.”

The posting is very cynical of politics (playing into what seems to be a theme on this site) and of the Democratic Party in particular, and thus, very one-sided. However, as it is a blog, opinions are rife. Though, I must admit that it would be nice to know that they tried to make it more even-handed…

Most who commented on this blog agree with the opinion of the blogger, and note that it is not new to hear of corruption in politics. They bring additional perspective to the posting, citing previous cases where corruption has been apparent, some humorously, some more seriously, but they all make the same point.

But this is just one example of the political, US election-centric posts, and there are many more and most likely, many more to come as this topic is continually brought back to the table.

Change of plans

So, after a bit more searching, I noticed that the previous site I linked was not very up-to-date, and highly unlikely to change in this 2 week period that we have to monitor a particular blog, so I have chosen something different.

As this new blog has a variety of contributors, the archives are quite large, and the topics, varied. However, I believe this to be a plus. This blog is very much a blog, but it covers many relevant topics whether it be hard news or the more trivial side of the media.

Enjoy some Hot Air.

First Post from my brain

My brain is feeling drained...